Mehdi Teimouri; Mehdi Motififard; Sahar sadat Lalehzar; Mahsa Elyasi
Abstract
Background: Hip hemiarthroplasty is a common method in treating femoral neck fractures in patients older than 70 years old. Depending on the severity of bone destruction, and bone stock, two methods either cemented or non-cement bipolar prosthesis may be used.Methods: In a prospective study, ...
Read More
Background: Hip hemiarthroplasty is a common method in treating femoral neck fractures in patients older than 70 years old. Depending on the severity of bone destruction, and bone stock, two methods either cemented or non-cement bipolar prosthesis may be used.Methods: In a prospective study, 60 patients with femoral neck fractures who were referred to the university hospitals of Isfahan, Iran, were divided into two treatment groups: 30 patients were treated with cemented bipolar method and 30 with non-cement bipolar hip arthroplasty surgery. In a 6-month follow-up, the surgical outcomes were assessed using the VAS pain scale, SF36 general health instrument score, and Harris hip score (HHS). Results: The pain scale (VAS), SF36 and Harris scores showed non- significant differences in the two groups: pain=3.63 out of 10 in 3 months and 2.6 out of 10 in 6 months; SF36= 69 and 86 in 3 and 6 months ,respectively; HHS=78 in both in 3 and 6 month in the cemented group .In non-cemented group the pain scores were 3.91and 3.12 in 3 and 6 months; SF36=67 and 83, and HHS=82 in 3 and 6 months respectively.Conclusion: It seems that the two methods of cemented and non-cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty, in elderly hip fractures, would have similar pain, quality of life, and hip function in short term follow-ups.
